4th Amendment in Policing PaperPlace Your Order Now
How Does Our System Work?
It will take just three steps and two minutes to place your order
Submit your Question
Fill in the order form with all your instructions. Click submit then complete payment for your order.
Best Writer Assigned
We review your order's requirements to determine the most suited writer for it. We then assign it.
Calculate the price of your order
4th Amendment in Policing Essay
4th Amendment in Policing Assignment
As per the U.S. Constitution, the 4th Amendment safeguards individual privacy and the right of every citizen from unreasonable searches or governmental intrusion into their personal spaces, homes, property, and businesses. The 4th Amendment is thus fundamental to Americans. It also provides the grounds for various civil rights violation lawsuits put forward to review the actions of law enforcers, governmental entities, and agencies. It mainly comes into play in policing by limiting bad arrests and searches, which are frequent depending on the suspicions, biases, and stereotypes of the law enforcers.
However, owing to its provisions, the 4th Amendment can act as a hindrance to crime fighting for police officers. It is a solid reason for a bad search that leads to evidence against the suspect being thrown out of the tribunal. Police officers cannot stop and frisk or search people’s houses because of suspicions. They need concrete evidence or a search warrant before seeking to invade an individual’s privacy (American Bar Association par. 4). The 4th Amendment is also the source of community mistrust, particularly for the law enforcers in states like Cleveland and Boston who are criticized for the manner in which they handle investigations and manhunts, such as the abduction of the three young females and the case of the Boston Marathon Bombers.
In 2005, Antoine Jones was arrested for drug possession after the police put a tracker in his vehicle for a month without judicial approval. The case was viewed as a gross violation of the 4th Amendment and after several appeals, it found its way to the U.S. Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality of the law enforcers’ actions. The judges affirmed the ruling of the lower courts that the installation of a GPS tracking device on the vehicle of the suspect passed as an unlawful search as per the 4th Amendment (American Bar Association par. 10). ...................GET A PLAGIARISM FREE COPY