Logical error -Case Analysis

Place Your Order Now

How Does Our System Work?

It will take just three steps and two minutes to place your order

Submit your Question

Fill in the order form with all your instructions. Click submit then complete payment for your order.

Best Writer Assigned

We review your order's requirements to determine the most suited writer for it. We then assign it.

Download Your Paper

The writer completes your assignment and uploads the answer. You can now download your complete paper.

26k
+
Happy clients
8k
+
Active writers
98k
+
Orders completed
150
+
Support members

Calculate the price of your order

$ H. School
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed
$ U. Graduate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed
$ P. Graduate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
  • Proceed
$ Doctorate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed

24-7-custom-writing-serviceLogical error -Case Critique

Logical error -Case Study

 

 

Logical error can also be referred to as flaw in thinking. The first logical error in this case study is committed by Rachel. She thinks that voting the change would annoy Tom instead of coming up with a logical reason for voting the change. Rachel is mainly concerned with Ton’s actions rather than a good reason to vote the change. The second logical error is committed by Nicole. Nicole is against the change just because she thinks Mary will date the boss. She does not consider other factors for voting against the change.

The ethical standard that may be called into question by this error is conflict of interest. Conflict of interest occurs when employees prioritize their interests in matters related to the organization (Davis, 2019). Nicole and Rachel are acting just to please themselves. They are not necessarily concerned about the impact of the policy to the organization. Nicole’s aim is to spite Tom while Rachel’s aim is to stop Mary from dating the boss. Nicole and Rachel are going to make decisions based on their interest in the policy. They do not consider the overall organization to see whether it will benefit from the change in policy or not. Employees in organizations ought to avoid conflict of interest.

To remedy the situation, I would advise Nicole and Rachel to settle their personal differences with Mary and Tom rather than applying them in the organization policies. Doing this will help them establish health relationships with their workmates. I will also advise them to be objective in matters relating to the organization. Objectivity is key in helping organizations attain their goals. I will inform Nicole and Rachel that the policies are likely to impact the organization in a long-term manner and they should come up with better reasons against or for the change.

...........GET A PLAGIARISM FREE COPY