The Self-Attribution Fallacy paper

Place Your Order Now

How Does Our System Work?

It will take just three steps and two minutes to place your order

Submit your Question

Fill in the order form with all your instructions. Click submit then complete payment for your order.

Best Writer Assigned

We review your order's requirements to determine the most suited writer for it. We then assign it.

Download Your Paper

The writer completes your assignment and uploads the answer. You can now download your complete paper.

26k
+
Happy clients
8k
+
Active writers
98k
+
Orders completed
150
+
Support members

Calculate the price of your order

$ H. School
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed
$ U. Graduate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed
$ P. Graduate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
  • Proceed
$ Doctorate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed

24-7-custom-writing-serviceThe Self-Attribution Fallacy Assignment

The Self-Attribution Fallacy Article Review

 

 

In his article, "The Self-Attribution Fallacy" George Monbiot argues that being industrious does not automatically mean that one will become rich. He goes ahead to say that many people who are rich in the current world got their positions because the opportunities they had such as capturing particular jobs. In this case, he echoes the findings of psychologist Daniel Kahnerman which shows that the rich people showed zero performance and many received bonuses just because of being lucky (Monbiot, 2011).

In the article, George also goes ahead to point out research conducted by Fritzon and Board to illustrate how organisations appoint psychopathic managers. He tells us that the reason most of these individuals are being employed as executives is that they can manipulate people thus giving a wrong impression to the owners of the organisation. However, most of these persons with psychopathic characteristics end up exploiting the workers of the organisation. He adds that most of them are being born in well-privileged families and their luck gives them a chance to attend business schools (Monbiot, 2011). Unfortunately, the knowledgeable poor people continue to suffer, and they are being referred to as the less valuable.

George furthermore tells us how the current society recognises the efforts of the rich. He claims that it makes them feel the chosen ones and they are mostly referred to as the creators of wealth. Conversely, that is not the case because these individuals misuse their power by preying on the creativity and labour of an organisation's workers. It is denoted by the statistics illustrated by the rich nations where most of the income earned by the poor decreases while that of the rich increases.  He concludes by saying that people have been able to understand what is going on in organisations and as a result, they need action to be taken to the undeserving wealthy individuals................GET A PLAGIARISM FREE COPY