U.S. Supreme Court Assignment

Place Your Order Now

How Does Our System Work?

It will take just three steps and two minutes to place your order

Submit your Question

Fill in the order form with all your instructions. Click submit then complete payment for your order.

Best Writer Assigned

We review your order's requirements to determine the most suited writer for it. We then assign it.

Download Your Paper

The writer completes your assignment and uploads the answer. You can now download your complete paper.

26k
+
Happy clients
8k
+
Active writers
98k
+
Orders completed
150
+
Support members

Calculate the price of your order

$ H. School
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed
$ U. Graduate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed
$ P. Graduate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
  • Proceed
$ Doctorate
  • Single Spacing
  • Double Spacing
Proceed

24-7-custom-writing-serviceU.S. Supreme Court Essay

U.S. Supreme Court Research Paper

 

 

            Under the Constitution of the United States, jurisdiction over local and domestic relations outside federal territories and enclaves is left to the state government. State policies pertaining to domestic relations are; however, subject to the Fourteenth Amendment’s mandates that require the states to preserve the due process of law and the equal protection of citizens by laws (Magstadt, 2017). The modern due process cases provided by the U.S. Supreme Court recognize the constitutional rights to co-habitation and free sexual decisions, both homosexual and heterosexual. This came about after the case of Obergefell v. Hodges that determined that a state must license the marriage between two individuals of the same sex. The vote was quite narrow with a 5-4 majority for the right to protect same-sex unions.

            The majority held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides the civil right to marry as one of the most significant citizenship liberties it safeguards, and that clause applies to same-sex marriages as it does for opposite-sex unions. The precedent further stated that the right to marry was inherent to the ideology of personal autonomy. It also protects the intimacy between two people, social order, and the children in same-sex families. However, the Supreme Court also recognized the right of religious institutions to maintain their principles by denying same-sex couples the opportunity to marry as per the First Amendment, which protects the religious rights of individuals. The dissenters, on the other hand, released a statement saying that while same-sex unions are just and good, the U.S. Constitution does not address the issue; hence, it is beyond the jurisdiction of the Court to make a decision whether to legalize it in the states (Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015). Instead, the matter should be left for the state legislatures to choose based on the will of their residents..................GET A PLAGIARISM FREE COPY